• Board index
  • FAQ
  • Search
  • Members
  • Smartfeed
  • Login
  • Register

View unanswered posts » View active topics


Board index » General » Science, Tech & NASA's New Missions

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet

Moderator: Moderators



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 5 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
shāf
 Post subject: Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:47 am 
Offline
Captain
Captain
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 11:34 am
Posts: 2748
From io9.com:

Attachment:
skynet4_inf466_01.jpg
skynet4_inf466_01.jpg [ 65.96 KiB | Viewed 255 times ]

With the launch of a new communications satellite, the British military has completed a highly advanced network that will allow robotic military units to be controlled at long range. Sound vaguely familiar? They actually named the thing Skynet. When the T-1000s come knocking, keep an eye out for the "Made in UK" sticker.

Skynet 5 is the latest iteration of a global communications system deployed by the British Armed Forces. The final satellite in the system was launched this week, and will allow high-bandwidth telecommunications between British forces located anywhere in the world. In addition to voice communications, it will allow data transfer and the remote control of robot airplanes, one of which is called "The Reaper." One of the manufacturers was quoted by BBC News as saying:

Quote:
So, computers can talk directly to computers.


Are you terrified yet? It gets better. The system is actually privately owned and developed - the British Armed Forces are only promised a portion of the bandwidth as part of the contract. The one reassuring aspect is that the company is not called Cyberdyne.

Seriously, what the hell? Is it British humor to name something like this Skynet, or bureaucratic idiocy? Might as well get to work on the self-awareness chip and the "really angry at humans" algorithm. Image by: BBC News.


Top
 Profile  
 
Scorpiuscat
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:49 am 
Offline
General of Jonja (5 Star)
General of Jonja (5 Star)
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:17 pm
Posts: 11941
Location: Somewhere on the edge of reality
LOL....are you freaking kidding me? :shock:


They had to be aware of the name they decided on, they had to know. :paranoid:

_________________
"All civilizations become either spacefaring or extinct." -- Carl Sagan


Top
 Profile  
 
BULL
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 10:51 am 
Offline
Brigadier General (1 Star)
Brigadier General (1 Star)
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:56 pm
Posts: 6565
Location: Colorado
I like the image in the middle of the chart the best. Skynet in charge of a Trident sub... great...


:?

_________________
Fantom Thrust - SHW Battlebot
Dell M6300 - loaded
Dell M6700 - loaded
:twisted: X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9


Top
 Profile  
 
Waylander
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:25 pm 
Offline
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 12:49 pm
Posts: 548
What better name is there?


Top
 Profile  
 
BULL
 Post subject: Re: Sarah Connor Has Failed -- the British Just Built Skynet
PostPosted: Fri Jun 13, 2008 1:36 pm 
Offline
Brigadier General (1 Star)
Brigadier General (1 Star)
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 5:56 pm
Posts: 6565
Location: Colorado
For those of you who have seen the movie "Stealth", while the movie as a whole is a bit out there and it's quality is questionable, there is one exchange between two characters as they refer to the pros and cons of "war" in the hands of AI. The pros were that commanders don't have to write home to wives and family about their dead soldier. But more importantly (...and I agree...) is that war becomes "easy" when there isn't a direct consequence...

I've indirectly done work on the Global Hawk, and I hated every minute of it. This is a weapon that has no consequences other than our tax dollars and whether or not HQ can live with it's decision.

_________________
Fantom Thrust - SHW Battlebot
Dell M6300 - loaded
Dell M6700 - loaded
:twisted: X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
 [ 5 posts ] 

Board index » General » Science, Tech & NASA's New Missions

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group | DVGFX2 by: Matt